It is at times like these, when there is a stalemate in the talks between Israel, Palestinians and the wider Arab world that people on both sides become despondent. When this situation occurs, the Israeli Government digs its heels into the ground and does nothing. Both sides seek ways of avoiding each other in order to achieve peace. The demand that there be no preconditions is unrealistic, when there are preconditions that are so ingrained on both sides. The divide is so great and the motivation for negotiating a peace settlement is filled with excuses to justify why the two sides are unwilling to meet.
If we look around us and see what is happening in Syria, the evil Assad regime carries on murdering thousands of innocent Syrians.100 000 Syrians have been massacred and there is no sign of it abating.
We in Israel, are sitting on the sidelines detesting the evil Assad regime and its alliance with the terrorist Shiite Hezbollah movement under Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, who sits in his bunker making demagogic, warlike speeches against Israel. There is also the rebel opposition to Assad who are also no paragons of virtue. The opposition itself is divided in its goals and is splintered into many groups. It is composed of extremist Jihadi groups such as Salafis, Al Qaeda and dissident groups with the destruction of Syria and its people as a goal. Even among the rebel groups there does not seem to be a leader that can take over from Assad. The Putin regime of Russia is complicating the issue by intending to supply S 300 missiles to the Assad regime. Putin's excuse - he intends to carry out agreements with Assad that Russia had already signed.
The UN does not seem to be involved much in condemning the massacres in Syria with innocent Syrian people being caught in the crossfire between the Assad regime and the rebels who are no less cruel and indifferent to their plight. A serious refugee problem has been created as many Syrians have fled to Jordan, Turkey and even attempts to enter Israel.
What we see is an amorphous band of murderous bandits on both sides pillaging, looting, raping and killing innocent people. Something went very wrong with the revolution in Syria. Shiites against Sunnis, rich against poor, tribe against tribe, seeking revenge against the Assad regime which has no intention of establishing human rights, democracy or rebuilding Syria into a country where a democratic parliament replaces the Assad tyranny.
Whenever a situation seems hopeless in our part of the world, the importance of seeking new directions to peace by being imaginative, having some fore-sight, mixed with perhaps a naive form of altruism, is all that is left to achieve peace that we all need do much.
The Arab Spring has not achieved a real and democratic change as was hoped in the beginning. The blame must be laid on the doorstep of the politicians who have replaced the dictators.
Returning to Israel's and the Palestinians' inability to enter peace negotiations. Both sides lack a leadership that could get negotiations started. Both sides have unimaginative politicians that are unable to put new ideas on the negotiating table. Both sides have preconditions despite Israel's claim to the contrary. Building settlements instead of agreeing to freeze them in the occupied territories is no less than a precondition of the Palestinians that demand Israel's withdrawal to the 1967 borders as was before the Six Day War.
Both Israelis and Palestinians desire peace. It is the people that desire peace more than the politicians. The politicians bluff the people with promises but at the end of the day it is the same conflict that shatters the hopes of both peoples for peace.The people on both sides must take the initiative by reaching out to each other. This can be done using the Internet and its social applications such as Facebook. If politicians use this media to reach out so can we, the ordinary people, do the same.
Peace and dialogue can be achieved by seeking ways of cooperating in the cultural fields. An outstanding example that comes to mind is the use of music as a facilitator. Daniel Barenboim, the famous Israeli-Argentinian pianist, and the late Edward Said, a musician in his own right, had put in a great effort to instill love of classical music into a mixed Palestinian - Israeli Orchestra. This orchestra performed concerts together. Another example is the cooperation between Israeli musicians of North African origin and Arab musicians that has proved to be a great success. These mixed groups should be encouraged to perform in Israel and Palestine on a wider scale. This would go a long way in bringing both sides together. The more bonds one creates in various cultural activities, the easier it will become to breach the gaps that exist. Palestinian literature should be made more freely available to Israelis and vice verse.Music expresses happiness, sadness, drama and tragedy. Music can express human emotions, which are universal. This could be a starting point. How did the US and Communist China, who were sworn enemies, under the Richard Nixon era get together? It was the result of a table tennis match.
Common interests rather than differences bring people together. Politicians divide and brainwash people to demonize another people as in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict. They are the facilitators for unrest, hate and lack of trust. The motivation of politicians is their own prestige under guise of serving their country and its people. Politicians should be our servants as we put them into power. Once they are in power, we become their servants. They create the mess and conflict. The leaders in power should be carrying out the people's desires in achieving peace. The catalysts for peace are the arts that are a common expression for both sides. Music that reflects a common Oriental Jewish - Arab culture has great potential for achieving peace. In the Arab countries, where Jews had lived for centuries, there was a great overlap of cultures each contributing to the other. This was never the case in Christian Europe 500 - 600 years ago. The potential is there to begin the process of peace negotiations between the two parties as they have more in common than what divides them.
Friday, May 31
Saturday, May 11
The Refusal of Professor Stephan Hawking
It is a great disappointment to all of us that Professor Stephen Hawking has bowed to pressure from Palestinian academics not to attend Israel's Presidential Conference. Professor Hawking is a genius and has affected our way of thinking on the cosmos, physics and mathematics. His brilliant mind, powers of deduction and logic, will always be his legacy for all mankind.Something has happened to his logic when it comes to attending this conference. Why has his sense of logic that has served the whole world of cosmology and science failed him in this case? He has been to Israel a few times and has always received accolades here.
It is possible that he was under pressure from Palestinian academics, who support BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) and Israel's total destruction. This comes from Prof. Norman Finkelstein, a controversial severe critic of Israel as illustrated in the video clip linked. It is surprising to all of us that Hawking does not realize this or maybe he does.
It is obvious that academic freedom does not exist in the Arab states as it does in Israel. There is no apartheid in Israel and the Israeli Universities have many Arab students and lecturers. Some are even heads of departments and professors.
When one visits an Israeli hospital, one meets many Arab doctors, nurses and pharmacists, who hold senior positions and in many cases are heads of departments as well. (My boss is an Arab Muslim pharmacist - a situation that would never occur in apartheid South Africa before ANC took over power) Most pharmacists in the sick fund clinics and pharmacy chain stores are Arabs. They also excel in other academic spheres such as law and the teaching profession.
Of course the occupation is bad for Israel. Most Israeli academics, to whom Hawking has given the sleight, are against the occupation and rightly so. Many Israeli academics even participate in movements against the occupation and for Palestinian freedom. The Palestinians do deserve a state side by side with Israel and Jerusalem being the shared capital of both states.
The illegal settler policies of the government, with its building policies in the occupied territories, are deplorable and unjustified. Many previous posts of mine are devoted to this subject and I shall not dwell on it here. Suffice it to say, a distinction must be made between the occupation and academic freedom in Israel. Academic freedom in Israel exists and nobody is prevented from attending congresses because of the country from which he comes.
I have been to meetings in this country where Palestinian academics have been invited to participate and address us on topics of which they have expertise.The security situation in Israel is very sensitive because of Islamist Jihadi extremists from Hamas and its allies that wish to infiltrate for the purpose of committing terrorist acts against Israelis. Palestinians, who come to Israel, undergo security clearance and this includes Palestinian academics unfortunately. However, Palestinian academics do get permits to participate in seminars and congresses. It is NOT apartheid, just a matter of security because of terrorist threats that have decreased significantly as the security forces are more beefed up these days than in the past.
If only the security checks were unnecessary. It would be wonderful were there an open border policy between Israel and Palestine so that both peoples could enjoy what each population group has to offer for the common good of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Even Hawking relies on Israeli technology such as the Intel chip that is an essential part of his life supporting equipment and means of communication. It seems illogical when this very brilliant and logical scientist pays heed to Palestinian academics whose goal is the "final solution" - the destruction of Israel. Apart from that these Palestinian academics keep silent on the lack of academic freedom in Palestinian Universities and the absence of human rights and democracy in their country of origin. Surely they are masters of double standards and hypocrisy. There is no other way of looking at it.
Where is Hawking, and for that matter, the moral stand of the rest of the world on the Syrian War, when innocent people are murdered in their tens of thousands on a daily basis? What about l "academic freedom" and "human rights" in Gaza under Hamas and for that manner in the PA controlled West Bank? Why is there no hue and cry on these issues? The brutality of the Syrian Bashar El Assad regime, his Iranian allies Ahmadinajad and Hezbollah of the "great Shiite humanist" Sheik Hassan Nasralla, stoking the flames of hate and bloodshed in Syria and their hope for the destruction of the"Zionist Entity" - Israel. The world says very little about this and, least of all Hawking, who apparently has joined the ignominious group of Israeli academic bashers. So much wasted energy and for what? Palestinian academics preventing Hawking from addressing enlightened Israeli academics, most of whom are against the occupation, is appalling and hypocritical.
It would be wonderful if this brilliant professor would reconsider his decision and come to address the 2013 Presidential Congress.
Related articles
Furore deepens over Stephen Hawking's Israel boycott
Academic boycott of Israel joined by Hawking
Political Science: Hawking rapped for Israel boycott
Stephen Hawking's support for the boycott of Israel is a turning point | Ali Abunimah
Stephen Hawking Signs Up to the Academic Boycott of Israel
It turns out that Hawking is no Einstein
British physicist Stephen Hawking boycotts Israel
Fellow ALS sufferer to 'hero' Hawking: Reconsider Israel boycott
Monday, April 29
Is The Arab Spring becoming a Nightmare?
| Middle East (Photo credit: rogiro) |
| Syria (Photo credit: ewixx) |
The uprisings in the various Arab countries spreading across Tunisia, Egypt and Libya to the Middle East seemed to be a long awaited dream fulfilled. The intellectual, secular people, many of them young academics, wanted a radical change to the autocratic, megalomanic regimes ruling their respective countries for many generations. Dictators of the likes of Husni Mubarac of Egypt, Muammar Ghaddafi of Libya were overthrown in bloody uprisings.
It all started with Mohamed Bouazizi of Sidi Bouzid in Tunisia setting himself alight and burning himself to death on 17th December 2010 during increasingly violent demonstrations. This eventually led to the downfall of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali on 14th January 2011.
The demonstrations spread like wild fire across many Arab countries in North Africa and the Middle East. The reasons for the uprising were the same in all these countries. High unemployment rate, hunger, corruption, no freedom of speech, basic human rights and political freedoms were non-existent. The people were also living in severe poverty.
Many of us felt that these uprisings were a positive development. At last the Arab people would achieve human rights and democracy. They will become an integral part of the free world. The idea of basic human rights, which we in the free world take for granted, is non-existent in the Arab countries, not to mention the intense suffering of the people under evil dictators, who became wealthy on the backs of their own people.
Many people, even in Israel, were supportive of the uprisings in the hope that at last pragmatism in the Arab world would move the Middle East towards peace between Israel and her Arab neighbours. There was also hope that the uprisings would have a positive effect on change in government in Palestine, where corruption is rife and lack of transparency is also taking its toll on the Palestinian people. Maybe, as many of us thought - perhaps naively, that Hamas would go and democracy would replace the megalomaniac leadership in Gaza. Naturally, many of us hoped to see peace negotiations with a representative Palestinian leadership that would also end the Israeli Occupation and a democratic Palestinian state alongside Israel would be closer to becoming a reality.
Now more than three years later we see that the Arab Spring did bring changes and new leadership in so-called democratic elections with the exception of Syria and Lebanon who are embroiled in factional fighting. In Syria, tens of thousands of innocent civilians are being massacred on a daily basis. The Assad regime is hanging on by a fine thread and President Bashar al Assad's forces are having a free day murdering opponents of his regime without mercy. Assad is being supported by the evil Iranian regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his evil proxy, Hezbollah, a terrorist Shiite movement under Sheik Hassan Nasrallah's leadership that is responsible for the unrest in Lebanon as well as the firing of rockets into Israel from the north.
The problem in Syria is very complex as there is factional fighting among the rebels themselves. A power vacuum is being created on the ground, which is being filled rapidly by Islamist fanatic groups such as Al Qaeda, Salafis and various extremist Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda. Rebel fighter cruelty, as well as the cruelty of the Assad regime with the latter's use of chemical weapons to remain in power at all costs, is moving Syria into a bloody free for all killing fields of Islamist terror groups. The future in Syria is grim and unpredictable, so much so that the EU is not prepared to send arms to bolster an alternative regime to Bashar al Assad for fear that the weaponry will fall into Islamist terrorist hands.
Our hearts go out to the suffering Syrian People - innocent men, women and children, who have nowhere to go. We should open our borders to allow entry to these refugees to save them from certain death. Even Turkey and Jordan have given these people shelter. We Jews had our Holocaust under Nazi Germany and we were refugees seeking shelter in western countries, many of whom never allowed us entry or granted us asylum. This should be engraved in our collective memory when dealing with fellow human beings who are in severe distress as in Syria. We must not pass the buck and say that it is the neighbouring Arab countries' "responsibility".
It is sad that all the uprisings in the Middle East did not bring positive regime change for which we hoped. Why does democracy always allude the new so-called post-uprising governments? Is it because many people in these countries do not know the meaning of democracy or have been brainwashed by Islamic parties, who promised the people that a return to Islam would secure their self-esteem, freedom and dignity, which was eroded by the various autocratic regimes?
Tunisia has an Islamist regime - Enahda Party rule - which has not initiated changes towards democracy and economic improvement for its people. There are gross dissatisfaction and disillusionment in Tunisia. Where are the secular academics, who were at the forefront of the uprisings? It does not look as if the Tunisian people will benefit from the changes. On the ground, there has been no movement to alleviate the economic situation there nor shift towards a western-style democracy. Enahda is an Islamist Party that places great emphasis on Sharia law. The same can be said of Egypt's Moslem Brotherhood which was also at the forefront of the uprising.
Dr Mohammed Morsi, an American University graduate, of the Muslim Brotherhood was elected President of Egypt midst great ground root support of optimism. He exhibited pragmatism in his speeches and initially won the hearts of his people as he swept into victory with his demagoguery-type speeches. Once in power, he did not show any signs of delivering the goods that his people expected. Dissatisfaction increased and the anti-democratic side of Morsi's leadership style became clear. Mass demonstrations occurred once again in Tahrir Square in Cairo, followed by anti-Morsi demonstrations in other city squares in Egypt. Basic human rights and liberalisation did not occur. The people are dissatisfied with Morsi. Women's rights are trampled on and they are also abused in Egypt. Signs that Egypt will become a democratic country respecting human rights and having a sound economy is still very far away. There will be no fair distribution of wealth so that Egypt's people can benefit.
The trends after the various uprisings seem to be clear even at this stage. Power will be in the hands of Islamist regimes that will remain conservative and insensitive to democratic change. It is as if those who had initiated regime change to a new positive order were thwarted by a severe backlash of Islamic conservatism and intolerance that is resistant to meaningful change. It seems that the downfall of conservative, cruel despots have been replaced by Islamic despots who are not going to move towards progressive and democratic leadership.
The situation in the territories whether under Hamas in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank were hardly affected and for them, it is business as usual. Hamas in Gaza is anti-democratic, racist and will tolerate no opposition to their regime. They are cruel and heartless as well as being an offshoot of the Moslem Brotherhood of Egypt. The future in Gaza remains grim for the Palestinians living there. Those who oppose the Hamas leadership face severe punishment and even death by being towed by donkey cart in the streets. Hamas survives on terror and dissatisfaction of its citizens, blaming Israel for Palestinian suffering. Hamas has no plan for rehabilitating its people. It is doubtful if the Arab Spring would have any positive effect in the Palestinian autonomous areas as there has been no progressive new order replacing the autocratic despotic regimes prior to the uprisings in the various Arab countries, where regime change did not mean any change for the better.
Much has been ventured in the Arab Spring but nothing has been gained. The Arab Spring may be referred to as an Arab Nightmare. This is true of what is happening in Syria.
Related articles
Qatar 'playing with fire' as it funds Syrian Islamists in quest for global influence
Thomas L. Friedman: Loss of Fayyad is yet another setback for West Bank solution
What is the impact of the Arab Spring on the Palestinian Authority's foreign policy?
On the Issue of Palestinian Support for the Assad Regime
'Brotherhood turns back on Gaza'
Saturday, April 13
Israel's 65 th Independence Day
| Ahmad Tibi - אחמד טיבי - Israeli Knesset member (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| PORTRAIT OF EMILE HABIBI, ISRAEL COMMUNIST PARTY (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| David Ben-Gurion (First Prime Minister of Israel) publicly pronouncing the Declaration of the State of Israel, May 14 1948, Tel Aviv, Israel, beneath a large portrait of Theodor Herzl, founder of modern political Zionism, in the old Tel Aviv Museum of Art building on Rothshild St. The exhibit hall and the scroll, which was not yet finished, were prepared by Otte Wallish. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| Baqa-Jatt is the sixth largest Arab city in Israel (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| Arab People Fleeing (Photo credit: Government Press Office (GPO)) |
Israel is still a young country with many social problems. For many Israelis it is a day of barbecues, plastic and inflatable hammers, foam sprays, vandalism and pollution of public parks with garbage, accompanied by high decibel Oriental Music (Israeli "Arse" Music) bursting one's ears. This year it will be the same pollution and vandalism, which is so much part of the celebrations of Independence Day. It is also a living hell for many household pets who run away from the various firework displays. Who knows how many pets will be abandoned during this time?
The other side of the coin is Al Naqba (The Catastrophe) observed by Palestinians in the occupied territories. It is also observed passively by the Israeli Arab community.
The streets of Israeli cities, towns and settlements are bedecked with Israeli flags as well as blue and white streamers. In contrast to this, in the Israeli Arab towns and villages it is business as usual with no Israeli flags visible anywhere.
The question that should come to one's mind is: Where have we failed to create a feeling of a common patriotism for Israel so Independence Day can be part of the Israeli heritage for all its citizens irrespective of race, colour or creed?
Al Naqba should be viewed as part of the history of Israel's establishment alongside the Zionist narrative. Symbols of Israel's people should be part of a common patriotism which could unite both Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel. It would create more tolerance and understanding among all Israel's citizens. Lately there have been vandal attacks on mosques and churches by various extremist right wing religious Jewish groups. The most notorious being Price Tag (Tag Machir). All this is caused by lack of education and tolerance towards those who are not Jewish. Racism in Israel is on the increase.
Before the actual Independence Day celebrations, it would be positive for Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel to sit down and discuss each other's history. Ways of creating a common loyalty so that both the Zionist and Arab narrative of 1947/48 should be aired in a feeling of openness between the two peoples. The South African model of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, as was carried out under the patronage of Archbishop Desmond Tutu in South Africa, be adapted for all Israelis to create healing process, would go a long way to establish a common patriotism.
The next step would be finding symbols that would give Israeli Arab citizens a feeling of identity with Israel. It could be an olive branch or a symbol representing the three monotheistic faiths. These are symbols that recognize the diversity of Israel's people and at the same time create a sense of patriotism common to all.
Celebration of Israel's Independence Day is very partisan when 20 % of Israel's citizens do not identify with Israel.
A common patriotism must begin on the first day at school. Education should be the same for all pupils. Arabs and Jews should be encouraged to go to the same schools. The only time justifying separation is when it comes to religious classes. This is the case in schools overseas where Jewish children learn Tanach, Christian children-the New Testament, Muslims-the Koran. The amount of time devoted for religious studies should be decided by the school committee composed of members of all faiths. Citizenship studies should be the same for all groups.
The biggest problem to initiate a common feeling of patriotism is how it should be done. This would involve total re-education of teachers to guide the transition towards a common patriotism. Programmes for teacher training to receive the tools on how to achieve this would go a long way in reaching this goal. It cannot be done overnight, as the wounds of the conflict and its history runs very deep, and as mentioned earlier in this article, a process of healing based on a truth and reconciliation programme would be a good start.
In many western countries (of which Israel claims to be part), schoolchildren of all faiths pledge allegiance to their countries of birth. This sense of allegiance irrespective of race, color or creed is part of a common patriotism for all citizens.
It could be achieved here in Israel. The advantages are great. One positive aspect would be a total negation of the claim that Israel is an apartheid state which would improve Israel's standing in the world. This would also bring much needed peace closer between Israel and the Palestinians as all Israel's citizens will be united in the desire to end the occupation and reach a just peace with security for all.
When the feeling of a common patriotism is achieved, we will see Israeli flags in Arab villages alongside bunting symbolizing all Israel's citizens' unity imbued with a common pride for the country of their birth.
Saturday, March 23
On the Way to a Fool's Paradise?
| English: Cropped version of File:Official portrait of Barack Obama.jpg. The image was cropped at a 3:4 portrait ratio, it was slightly sharpened and the contrast and colors were auto-adjusted in photoshop. This crop, in contrast to the original image, centers the image on Obama's face and also removes the flag that takes away the focus from the portrait subject. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The campaign of Yesh Atid in its (Haredi) ultra-Orthodox bashing had teamed up with Bayit Hayedi of Naftali Bennett. The result - Netanyahu did not have much options and had to take both parties into his coalition. This is proof that the differences between Yesh Atid and Bayit Hayehudi are marginal.
The ideology of the religious right wing Zionist Bayit Hayehudi are very settler-oriented. Naftali Bennett, the leader of Bayit Hayehudi, is against the two-state solution. The attitude of Yesh Atid towards this issue is dubious and unclear. Yair Lapid, leader of Yesh Atid, has not made much reference to solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict except talking about not having any "Zuabis" in the coalition whatever that means.
The coalition is on the verge of turning Israel into a "Fool's Paradise". On examining the composition of the new coalition, there does not seem to be any improvement over the previous right wing coalition with the Haredim (ultra-Orthodox) in it.
The composition of this 19th Knesset cabinet portfolios that were held by the Haredim, are now held by right wing Bayit Hayehudi members. The priorities of the taxpayers' money will change. Instead of going to parasitic Haredi partisan causes, as has been the case for many years creating a massive pool of ultra-Orthodox parasitic students, destined for poverty and state funding all their lives; the money will be funding the building of illegal settlements in the West Bank. So what will be achieved in this "changing of the religious guard"? Nothing! The complexity of a solution to the conflict will increase. The areas that should be designated theoretically to the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel will be usurped because of increased building on Palestinian lands. All government departments concerned with expropriation of lands for development of housing projects have extremist right wingers heading them.
The new government will be concerned in preventing any movement towards a two-state solution apart from official lip-service which we shall hear on Obama's visit. Words! Words! Words with no purpose apart from appeasing Obama.
I do not know what is worse for Israel. Funding Haredi parasites, or West Bank illegal settlers turning the occupation into an everlasting fact on the ground. I think the latter is worse for Israel's standing and also from a moral point of view.
Yair Lapid is to blame for this - he helped replace Haredim with right wing religious Zionist occupiers. He formed a pact with Bennett on the backs of the middle class in Israel. We shall see what he will achieve as Finance Minister. He will be relying on Bibi Netanyahu's expertise which is more taxation of the middle class - those whom he declares that he represents! He will be pressurized by his right wing coalition partners in the government to give bigger budgets to illegal settlement projects in the West Bank. The wimpish Hatnuah of Zippi Livni will be a non-factor in the coalition. Amir Peretz - so outspoken in social issues will be neutralized to a squeak as Minister of Environment. Tzippi Livni, the Justice Minister and responsible for negotiations with the Palestinians, will be towing the Netanyahu line which will be the Bennett-Feiglin-Danon-Akunis line that is extremist right to say the least.
The new government will be more illegal settler and occupation oriented than the previous. Thanks to Lapid and Bennett, we can look forward to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict being relegated to almost a non-issue while the false sense of illusion of no partner with whom to negotiate will be stated ad nauseam as an excuse to maintain the status quo. Is Israel, with its constellation of right-wing settler supporting shenanigans, partners for peace?
Israelis had the privilege of President Obama's state visit to Israel for three days. He was very warmly received. His warmth and support for the Israeli people was unprecedented. It left no doubt that his love and commitment towards Israel's security is unshakable and unbreakable. His speeches were peppered with quotes from Israel's past leaders, he even threw in some Hebrew words in his speeches, which increased the bond between him and the Israeli people.
Certainly from the outside, despite all the past reports of Bibi Netanyahu and Barack Obama having deep differences in their approach to a solution to the conflict, no sign of animosity between the two leaders was noticeable. The impression was that both men realize that they have to cooperate and work together despite their past differences.
The three day visit of Obama was amazing. He conquered the hearts of Israelis wherever he went and we were in no doubt that he is a true friend of Israel.
In his first term as president, Obama was a bit naive. I think of the famous Cairo Speech which he delivered at Cairo University in 2009 a year before the fall of the tyrannical Mubarak regime. In his speech people in Israel got the impression that Obama's sympathies lay with the despots of the Arab world. Rumors started sprouting all over the Jewish World that Obama is a Muslim because of his middle name Hussein and the right wing Zionists spread so many lies about Obama, moving heaven and earth to paint him into a persona non grata and an anti-Semite.
His visit to Israel proved how wrong they were. In fact we should all hang our heads in shame because of this stigma that the Zionist right wing tried to impose on Obama.
President Obama is a great orator and he exudes warmth and love for all mankind. His famous Jerusalem Speech to students and to Israelis in general (a You Tube clip of the entire speech is in a previous blog post) makes no bones about his true feelings for Israel. At the same time he was heavily cheered for his awareness of the hardships of the Palestinians, who are subject to army harassment everyday. He is correct in saying that peace must come from the people on both sides as both sides desire it. The people must pressurize their leaders to take the bold step to negotiate a just and lasting peace.
The last contribution Obama made was getting Netanyahu to apologize to Turkish Prime Minister Tayyep Erdogan for the deaths of Turkish citizens in the fiasco of the Mavi Marmara incident. This was a great move that will end the bitter relations between Turkey and Israel. There is a well known saying in Hebrew that says that one must be wise rather than be right.
Netanyahu telephoned Erdogan minutes before Obama's departure thus tying last unfinished business. Improved relations with Turkey is important in forming a pact against Iran and proxies and the increase of Al Qaeda influence in lawless, violent Syria which creates further instability in the Middle East. It is a great pity that Israel did not apologize to Turkey after the Mavi Marmara incident, but better late than never.
Now all that remains is that after these incredible speeches, words will be translated into action and that peace negotiations for a permanent solution to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict will begin. The priorities of the new government must be a just peace between Israel and the Palestinians, followed by a solution to its internal social problems. The one is dependent on the other.
If the government ignores the importance of peace negotiations with the Palestinians by placing its emphasis on internal problems and maintaining the occupation status quo, Israel will become a Fool's Paradise.
President Obama's visit was a breath of fresh air and one cannot feel indifferent to the positive messages he issued to all of us.
Related articles
- Obama vows 'never again' at Israeli Holocaust memorial (washingtontimes.com)
- Obama stirs young Israelis with the passionate speech of a left-wing Zionist (timesofisrael.com)
- PM says new government will pursue deal with Palestinians (timesofisrael.com)
- You: Obama facilitates reconciliation between Israel and Turkey (latimes.com)
Friday, March 22
End Times Watch: Obama's Speech To Israeli Students
There is no doubt in my mind that this speech was one of the highlights of his whistle stop tour to Israel. His words about the Palestinians mentioned in his speech were well balanced and fair.I am sure that it was not exactly to the liking of the Bennetts and Netanyahus in the Knesset. Wishing all my family and friends חג שמך לפסח It is important to remember that freedom for the Palestinians from the occupation and working for an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel is part of the lesson of Pesach.
Saturday, March 2
We need a Nelson Mandela!
| A peace movement poster: Israeli and Palestinian flags and the words peace in Arabic and Hebrew. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| Yesh Atid Election Night Party (Photo credit: The Israel Project) |
The Arab countries, who were at the forefront of the Arab Spring, Tunisia and Egypt, have not achieved democracy and the people are becoming dissatisfied because of the lack of progress towards that goal. Demonstrations are becoming common place and the results often end in violence and death.
The situation in the Middle East, especially in Syria, has not ruffled the world as much as the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict has and still does. This does not mean that the occupation of the West Bank and the Golan is justifiable. It is not. Of course the situation is not ideal and the lack of trust and hate between Israelis and Palestinians is dead-locked. If anything, the situation between Israel and Palestine is becoming more radicalized as a solution to the conflict is receding further away. The two-state solution is viewed as being unattainable as illegal Israeli settlements are being built rather than being frozen.
The Middle East is so volatile.One isolated incident can ignite the whole area. Israel is so busy with coalition building as two right wing parties, Yesh Atid and Bayit Hayehudi (The Jewish Home Party) have signed a pact rendering the formation of a coalition under Netanyahu very difficult to achieve if he includes the ultra-Orthodox paties with whom they are not prepared to sit in the Netanyahu coalition. The difference in ideology between these two parties is marginal today. The Yesh Atid Party (There is a Future Party) is such a misnomer because it is a one issue party. It represents a hatred of the ultra-Orthodox parties whom they feel should support compulsory military for ultra-Orthodox who do not share the military burden. It is a pity that many Israelis view this pathetic one-issue party as a panacea to Israel's national priorities. Their attitude towards peace is no different from the right wing settlement oriented parties, who are eroding the two-state solution. It is doubtful if they have any policy on peace which should be Israel's priority, but instead, is being buried in the sand.
Netanyahu is unable to build a coalition because of the Bennett-Lapid bond, which have much in common. Both parties are right wing. Yesh Atid is moving to the right despite its anti ultra-Orthodox stance. They are dragging Bayit Hayehudi into that stance as well. Lapid is no democrat. He has even forbidden his party members not to attend Geneva Initiative meetings which should give us all an idea as to what he really represents. He is showing megalomanic symptoms and wants to be in full control not allowing divergence of opinions on a solution to the serious problem of peace negotiations. Well what can one expect from a party that engages in ultra-Orthodox bashing instead of encouraging the finding of a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which is a tough and necessary challenge that we all need to face.
A very much weakened Likud-Beiteinu has emerged. It is faced with two options:
1. Signing a coalition agreement with the right wing Yesh Atid-Bayit Hayehudi-Kadima bloc which will give Netanyahu's coalition 70 seats
2. Signing a coalition agreement with the ultra-Orthodox parties and Tnuah (who has already signed an agreement to be in the Netanyahu-led government), which will still not give them enough votes to form a government. They would achieve a maximum of 57 seats. The minimum needed is 61 seats.
3. Calling for new elections which, according to the polls, will weaken Netanyahu even further.
On the face of it all, it seems that there are three options but in reality there are only two options for Netanyahu.
The result either way will be a right wing government with its face towards the status quo of more of the same - entrenching the occupation even further with more Israeli settlements being built in the West Bank resulting in further encroachment on Palestinian lands. This will decrease Israel's standing in the world even further and there will be increased divisions in Israel as well as further estranging Israel's non-Jewish minorities. Attacks on mosques and churches by fringe extremist right wing "Price Tag religious" ear-lock kippa-cladded rabble and their "Hill-Top Youth" allies will also increase. One must bear in mind that these religious extremists are by-products of right wing ideology which is so prevalent in Israel these days.
The need for a Nelson Mandela is more urgent now than ever before. There is no sign that a leader with a Nelson Mandela-like vision will arise either in Israel or in Palestine. This is our only hope.
Related articles
Saturday, February 23
Brinkmanship in Coalition Building in Israel
| Operator ... Coalition of the Willing? -- Israeli Electoral System (January 30, 2013 / 19 Shevat 5773) ... (Photo credit: marsmet546) |
| Shaul Mofaz (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| English: Amram Mitzna (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
| Emoticonfucius #3: "Netanyahu Sounds Awesome" (Photo credit: USb_cABLE) |
Will Netanyahu succeed in putting a coalition together? He may have a formula to perform this almost unimaginable feat as there are still a few options available to him that are not so compatible with his party's world view.
Just after the 22nd Jan 2013 Elections, he was given the mandate by President Peires to put a ruling coalition together. This was done after consultations with Yesh Atid, Bayit Hayehudi, and the ultra-Orthodox parties, who gave him the mandate to be prime minister. Meretz, Labor, Hadash and the Arab Parties did not support a mandate for Netanyahu.
The centrist right -Yesh Atid of Yair Lapid, and the right - Bayit Hayehudi of Naftali Bennett, formed an alliance to go into the Likud-Beitenu coalition on condition that the ultra-Orthodox religious parties will not be in the coalition.
This is a big headache for Netanyahu, who had promised to take the parasitic ultra-Orthodox parties into his coalition. All this had created a weird situation as Zipi Livni of Hatnua Party was the first to join the Likud-Beitenu coalition with a promise that she would be appointed Minister of Justice, and also be in charge of negotiations with the Palestinians. She will not be independent in making decisions on these negotiations as she will have to tow Netanyahu's line on that issue. Livni's decision lacks logic and she will further lose credibility. Amram Mitzna and Amir Peretz left Labor under Shelly Yachimovitz because they felt she would join the coalition. The joke is on them now.
It seems that brinkmanship is the name of the game. Shaul Mofaz, whose once strong Kadima Party has only 2 seats in the Knesset. He has decided to throw in his lot with Yesh Atid and Bayit Hayehudi.
Yair Lapid stated that he will not be part of a block preventing Netanyahu forming a coalition government. However that is what he has done using a different tactic by combining with the ultra right party of Bennett. Strange move or not so strange as both parties share a number of common principles. Yair Lapid has made statements referring to the Arab Parties as "Zuabies" (a reference to Hanin Zuabi MK in a derogetory manner) which has a streak of racism, and with whom he will never cooperate. Hardly surprising and is an indication of a threat to coalition building from a more right wing flank that push the conflict even further on the back-burner.
At the end of the day, on the verge of brinkmanship, they will all have to climb down their trees and be part of the Likud-Beitenu Coalition. The alternative would be new elections as the person who will be asked to form the next government, if Netanyahu fails, stands a good chance of not being able to perform this feat. Netanyahu gains to lose more support if there are new elections as many will join up with Yesh Atid and Bayit Hayehudi on the issue of conscripting the Haredim ( ultra-Orthodox ) to serve in the IDF.
If the threat to coalition building would come from the left (Labor, Meretz and the Arab Parties) we would be in a better situation as far as peace with our neighours and a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is concerned. There would be a chance of a true change of government that would improve Israel's status in the world. This is not the case at all with the Yesh Atid-Bayit Heyehudi on the right.
What we have is a quarrel between the right and centre right as to who will form the next government. It is unfortunate that peace negotiations is not the issue. Haredim serving in the army is a minor issue compared to the problems Israel faces from Iran, Hezbolla and Hamas. If there would be more emphasis on peace between Israel and its neighbours, the need for conscription would be minimized making it a non-issue. This of course should be considered.
It is obvious that Lapid wants a senior post in the cabinet or take a shot at being PM. He has no parliamentary experience. He is also not a social democrat and his newly found political ally is even less so. Many of us have no love for Netanyahu's illegal settler policies and his penchant for not freezing settlements in occupied areas. It would not be surprising if Labor joins up with Netanyahu if all else fails. Labor also stands to lose if there are new elections. The only parties that will gain is Yesh Atid and Bayit Hayehudi. Both Lapid and Bennett know this. A question mark remains if at the end of the day the brinkmanship will pay off. It just may.
One thing is certain - movement towards a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine will not occur because of these manoeuvres in coalition building. So many petty side issues are preventing a coalition deal which is not constructive nor will it improve Israel's image.
Related articles
Tortuous Coalition Talks May Force Israelis Back to Polls
As Netanyahu's Coalition Building Efforts Intensify, Whispers of New Israeli Elections Emerge
Analysis: Netanyahu gambit appears to backfire
News Analysis: Israel's Netanyahu risks inclusion of Livni into government
Yesh-Home pact could bring new elections, Likud warns
A month after Israeli election, Benjamin Netanyahu still unable to build coalition government
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







